Environment Protection Authority v. Maraline Pty Ltd [1998] NSWLEC 143

Environment Protection Authority v. Maraline Pty Ltd [1998] NSWLEC 143

The Court found beyond reasonable doubt that no waste was delivered to the Kemps Creek depot on 17 April 1996 as claimed, and that the information and receipt provided by Maraline Pty Ltd and Mr Suciu to the EPA were false or misleading in a material respect. Therefore, both defendants were found guilty of offences against s 85 of the Waste Act and s 10 of the Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 August 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment on Guilt
Outcome
Both defendants found guilty of providing false or misleading information under s 85 of the Waste Act.
Legal Topics
['false or Misleading Information' 'waste Management' 'corporate Liability' "directors' Liability"]
['environmental Law' 'criminal Law'] ['false or Misleading Information' 'waste Management' 'corporate Liability' "directors' Liability"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Judgment on Guilt

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Maraline Pty Ltd provided false or misleading information in response to a notice under s 68 of the Waste Minimisation and Management Act 1995' 'Whether Peter Suciu, as director, contravened the same provision under s 10 of the Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found beyond reasonable doubt that no waste was delivered to the Kemps Creek depot on 17 April 1996 as claimed, and that the information and receipt provided by Maraline Pty Ltd and Mr Suciu to the EPA were false or misleading in a material respect. Therefore, both defendants were found guilty of offences against s 85 of the Waste Act and s 10 of the Environmental Offences and Penalties Act 1989.

Court Disposition

Both defendants found guilty of providing false or misleading information under s 85 of the Waste Act.

Orders

  • []