Pehar v R [2020] NSWCCA 118
The sentencing judge erred by finding all offences aggravated by the applicant being 'in company', when the evidence did not support this for every offence. Only counts 2, 3, 4, and 5 were aggravated by the presence of others, and only to a minor degree. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to a lesser aggregate sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'aggravating Factors' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'in Company Aggravation' 'joint Criminal Enterprise']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether sentencing judge erred in finding all offences aggravated by being 'in company' under s 21A(2)(e) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)" 'Whether a lesser aggregate sentence is warranted']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by finding all offences aggravated by the applicant being 'in company', when the evidence did not support this for every offence. Only counts 2, 3, 4, and 5 were aggravated by the presence of others, and only to a minor degree. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to a lesser aggregate sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence varied
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal against sentence allowed.' 'Sentence imposed by Wilson SC DCJ on 12 August 2019 is quashed and in lieu thereof an aggregate sentence of 4 years and 6 months is imposed to commence on 27 September 2018 and expire on 26 March 2023, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment