Perticarini v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 192

Perticarini v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 192

The sentencing judge did not misapprehend the applicant's intellectual disability, and it was open not to find it mitigated moral culpability or impacted general deterrence. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or plainly unjust given the offending, relevant factors, and sentencing principles.

Parties
Applicant: Marco Perticarini; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 August 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Sentence, Robbery Armed With Knife, Intellectual Disability and Sentencing, General Deterrence, Manifestly Excessive Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marco Perticarini

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to find intellectual disability mitigated moral culpability
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to take into account intellectual disability when considering general deterrence
  3. 3 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not misapprehend the applicant's intellectual disability, and it was open not to find it mitigated moral culpability or impacted general deterrence. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or plainly unjust given the offending, relevant factors, and sentencing principles.

Court Disposition

Leave granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Grant leave to appeal.
  • Dismiss the appeal.