Perticarini v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 192
The sentencing judge did not misapprehend the applicant's intellectual disability, and it was open not to find it mitigated moral culpability or impacted general deterrence. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or plainly unjust given the offending, relevant factors, and sentencing principles.
- Parties
- Applicant: Marco Perticarini; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Robbery Armed With Knife, Intellectual Disability and Sentencing, General Deterrence, Manifestly Excessive Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marco Perticarini
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to find intellectual disability mitigated moral culpability
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to take into account intellectual disability when considering general deterrence
- 3 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not misapprehend the applicant's intellectual disability, and it was open not to find it mitigated moral culpability or impacted general deterrence. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or plainly unjust given the offending, relevant factors, and sentencing principles.
Court Disposition
Leave granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal.
- Dismiss the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment