Marco Rossi v Yingyu Si [2016] NSWSC 368

Marco Rossi v Yingyu Si [2016] NSWSC 368

Mr Rossi failed to establish by admissible evidence or the terms of the caveat that he holds a legal or equitable interest sufficient to support an extension of a caveat under s 74F of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), as his claim is limited to a right to the proceeds of sale and a potential entitlement under the Family Law Act, which do not give rise to a caveatable interest.

Parties
Plaintiff: Marco Rossi; Defendant: Yingyu Si
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Caveat / Hearing of Summons for Extension of Caveat
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
Torrens System, Caveat, Family Law Property Settlement, Equitable Interest, Renovation Works

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marco Rossi

Plaintiff

Yingyu Si

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Caveat / Hearing of Summons for Extension of Caveat

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff, Mr Rossi, holds a legal or equitable interest sufficient to support an extension of a caveat against the property registered to Ms Si under s 74F of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether rights arising from renovation works or potential Family Law Act property settlement confer a caveatable interest

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Rossi failed to establish by admissible evidence or the terms of the caveat that he holds a legal or equitable interest sufficient to support an extension of a caveat under s 74F of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), as his claim is limited to a right to the proceeds of sale and a potential entitlement under the Family Law Act, which do not give rise to a caveatable interest.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • Summons dismissed