Marco Rossi v Yingyu Si [2016] NSWSC 368
Mr Rossi failed to establish by admissible evidence or the terms of the caveat that he holds a legal or equitable interest sufficient to support an extension of a caveat under s 74F of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), as his claim is limited to a right to the proceeds of sale and a potential entitlement under the Family Law Act, which do not give rise to a caveatable interest.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Marco Rossi; Defendant: Yingyu Si
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Caveat / Hearing of Summons for Extension of Caveat
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Torrens System, Caveat, Family Law Property Settlement, Equitable Interest, Renovation Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marco Rossi
Plaintiff
Yingyu Si
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Caveat / Hearing of Summons for Extension of Caveat
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff, Mr Rossi, holds a legal or equitable interest sufficient to support an extension of a caveat against the property registered to Ms Si under s 74F of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
- 2 Whether rights arising from renovation works or potential Family Law Act property settlement confer a caveatable interest
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Rossi failed to establish by admissible evidence or the terms of the caveat that he holds a legal or equitable interest sufficient to support an extension of a caveat under s 74F of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), as his claim is limited to a right to the proceeds of sale and a potential entitlement under the Family Law Act, which do not give rise to a caveatable interest.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment