Marcus Clark and Co Ltd v Commonwealth [1952] HCA 50

Marcus Clark and Co Ltd v Commonwealth [1952] HCA 50

By majority, the Court held that the Defence Preparations Act 1951, s. 4, insofar as it authorises the Defence Preparations (Capital Issues) Regulations, and the regulations themselves, are laws with respect to defence within s. 51(vi.) of the Constitution, given the existing state of international emergency and the scale of defence preparations required. The restrictions on the issue of capital and securities, subject to the Treasurer’s discretion constrained by the requirement that it be exercised only for or in relation to defence preparations (as interpreted in light of the Act's preamble), were considered to have a real and substantial connection to defence preparations and not...

Parties
Plaintiff: Marcus Clark & Co. Ltd.; Plaintiff: R. B. Davies Industries Ltd.; Defendant: The Commonwealth of Australia; Defendant: Sir Arthur William Fadden (Treasurer); Defendant: Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 September 1952
Procedural Posture
Demurrers (heard Together in Equity Proceedings) / High Court Original Jurisdiction Determination of Demurrers to Defences
Outcome
Plaintiffs' demurrers overruled by majority. Act and regulations held valid and the Treasurer's refusal not unlawful.
Legal Topics
Defence Power, Economic Regulation, Capital Controls, Legislative Power Extent, Delegated Legislation, Administrative Discretion, Inflation and Defence, Scope of S. 51(vi.)
Constitutional Law Defence Power Economic Regulation Capital Controls Legislative Power Extent Delegated Legislation Administrative Discretion Inflation and Defence +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marcus Clark & Co. Ltd.

Plaintiff

R. B. Davies Industries Ltd.

Plaintiff

The Commonwealth of Australia

Defendant

Sir Arthur William Fadden (Treasurer)

Defendant

Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Demurrers (heard Together in Equity Proceedings) / High Court Original Jurisdiction Determination of Demurrers to Defences

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Are the Defence Preparations Act 1951 and the Defence Preparations (Capital Issues) Regulations valid as laws with respect to defence under s. 51(vi.) of the Constitution?
  2. 2 Is the Treasurer's refusal of consent to capital issues valid under the regulations?
  3. 3 Is the regulation of capital issues for the stated purposes supported by the defence power in times short of war?

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the Court held that the Defence Preparations Act 1951, s. 4, insofar as it authorises the Defence Preparations (Capital Issues) Regulations, and the regulations themselves, are laws with respect to defence within s. 51(vi.) of the Constitution, given the existing state of international emergency and the scale of defence preparations required. The restrictions on the issue of capital and securities, subject to the Treasurer’s discretion constrained by the requirement that it be exercised only for or in relation to defence preparations (as interpreted in light of the Act's preamble), were considered to have a real and substantial connection to defence preparations and not...

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' demurrers overruled by majority. Act and regulations held valid and the Treasurer's refusal not unlawful.

Orders

  • Demurrer overruled. Plaintiff Marcus Clark & Co. Ltd. to pay costs of the demurrer.
  • Demurrer overruled in R. B. Davies Industries Ltd.; costs reserved for further order.