Harris v Trustee Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme [2006] FCA 373
The Tribunal correctly applied ss 8A and 8B of the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth). Although the appellant and the deceased maintained a relationship of significance, the evidence did not establish that they ordinarily lived together as husband and wife on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis for the required continuous period. The payments made by the deceased to the appellant, while of some significance and relied upon by her, did not make her primarily, essentially or in the main dependent upon him. The Tribunal's decision was therefore not shown to involve legal error and the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal / Federal Court Appeal From Tribunal Decision Affirming Trustee's Denial of Spouse's Superannuation Benefit
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ["spouse's Superannuation Benefit" 'marital Relationship Under Superannuation Act 1976 (cth)' 'wholly or Substantially Dependent' 'review of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal Decision']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal / Federal Court Appeal From Tribunal Decision Affirming Trustee's Denial of Spouse's Superannuation Benefit
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant had a marital relationship with the deceased at the time of his death within ss 8A and 8B of the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth).' 'Whether the appellant was wholly or substantially dependent upon the deceased at the time of death within ss 8A and 8B of the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth).' 'Whether the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal applied the wrong legal tests to marital relationship and dependency.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal correctly applied ss 8A and 8B of the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth). Although the appellant and the deceased maintained a relationship of significance, the evidence did not establish that they ordinarily lived together as husband and wife on a permanent and bona fide domestic basis for the required continuous period. The payments made by the deceased to the appellant, while of some significance and relied upon by her, did not make her primarily, essentially or in the main dependent upon him. The Tribunal's decision was therefore not shown to involve legal error and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment