Booth v Di Francesco [2003] NSWSC 378

Booth v Di Francesco [2003] NSWSC 378

The defendant was not negligent in performing the hysterectomy or in advising the plaintiff of her condition and treatment options, as reasonable care was taken in explanation, the surgery was a defensible clinical choice given the plaintiff’s circumstances, and there was no breach of duty of care established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Negligence—medical Negligence—damages Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the defendant.
Legal Topics
['informed Consent' 'standard of Care' 'medical Practitioner Liability' 'causation' 'duty to Advise Patients']
['medical Negligence' 'professional Negligence' 'tort Law'] ['informed Consent' 'standard of Care' 'medical Practitioner Liability' 'causation' 'duty to Advise Patients']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Negligence—medical Negligence—damages Claim / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant medical practitioner negligently advised the plaintiff regarding her condition and available treatment options before a hysterectomy.' "Whether the performance of the hysterectomy was inappropriate or negligent in the plaintiff's circumstances."]

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was not negligent in performing the hysterectomy or in advising the plaintiff of her condition and treatment options, as reasonable care was taken in explanation, the surgery was a defensible clinical choice given the plaintiff’s circumstances, and there was no breach of duty of care established.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the defendant.

Orders

  • []