Cunningham v Local Court of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 499
Leave to appeal and certiorari were refused because the plaintiff showed no meritorious ground warranting intervention. There was no evidentiary basis for apprehended or actual bias, especially where a magistrate from another Local Court had been brought in to hear the matter; there was no procedural unfairness because counsel had time to arrange representation, provided written submissions, and the magistrate stood the matter down; the s 30 point was not raised before the magistrate and, in substance, the relevant fair-trial consideration was addressed; the erroneous finding about delay did not vitiate the decision; and certiorari would be futile and discretionary relief was not...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Under S 53(3)(b) of the Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 (nsw) and Alternative Application for Relief in the Nature of Certiorari Under S 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (nsw) / Supreme Court Review of Interlocutory Local Court Order Refusing to Vacate a Hearing Date and Transfer Proceedings to Another Court
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused and application to quash the Local Court order refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Appeals From Local Court Summary Proceedings' 'apprehended Bias' 'actual Bias' 'procedural Fairness' 'change of Venue' 'certiorari' 'discretionary Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Under S 53(3)(b) of the Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 (nsw) and Alternative Application for Relief in the Nature of Certiorari Under S 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (nsw) / Supreme Court Review of Interlocutory Local Court Order Refusing to Vacate a Hearing Date and Transfer Proceedings to Another Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted under s 53(3) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) to appeal the Local Court interlocutory order on a question of law alone.' 'Whether the Local Court order should be quashed by relief in the nature of certiorari under s 69 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW).' "Whether a fair-minded apprehension of bias arose because the plaintiff's estranged husband was employed by Corrective Services NSW at the relevant Local Court complexes." 'Whether the magistrate denied procedural fairness by determining the application when counsel who filed it was unavailable to appear.' 'Whether the magistrate erred by failing to apply s 30 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW).' 'Whether the magistrate acted with actual or apprehended bias or prejudged the application.' 'Whether an erroneous finding that counsel had delayed bringing the application vitiated the Local Court decision.' 'Whether expediency justified intervention or transfer to another Local Court.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal and certiorari were refused because the plaintiff showed no meritorious ground warranting intervention. There was no evidentiary basis for apprehended or actual bias, especially where a magistrate from another Local Court had been brought in to hear the matter; there was no procedural unfairness because counsel had time to arrange representation, provided written submissions, and the magistrate stood the matter down; the s 30 point was not raised before the magistrate and, in substance, the relevant fair-trial consideration was addressed; the erroneous finding about delay did not vitiate the decision; and certiorari would be futile and discretionary relief was not...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused and application to quash the Local Court order refused.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal pursuant to s 53(3) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 against the order made in the Local Court on 6 June 2017 refusing to vacate a hearing date and transfer the proceedings to another court refused.' 'Application to quash the order made in the Local Court on 6 June 2017 refusing to vacate...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment