Vagg v McPhee [2012] NSWCA 237
The respondents unreasonably failed to agree to an out-of-court resolution for a stay sought by the appellants, causing unnecessary costs; therefore, costs of the motion should be paid by respondents on an indemnity basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Motion for Stay of Execution and Costs Assessment
- Outcome
- Stay ordered; respondents to pay appellants' costs on indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Execution' 'costs' 'interlocutory Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Motion for Stay of Execution and Costs Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondents should pay the appellants' costs of the notice of motion on an indemnity basis" 'Whether a stay of execution and stay of costs assessment pending appeal should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents unreasonably failed to agree to an out-of-court resolution for a stay sought by the appellants, causing unnecessary costs; therefore, costs of the motion should be paid by respondents on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Stay ordered; respondents to pay appellants' costs on indemnity basis.
Orders
- ['Stay execution on the judgment pursuant to the orders below (7 March 2012) until appeal is heard and determined.' 'Stay the costs assessment in respect of the orders made below on 7 March 2012 until appeal is heard and determined.' "Respondents to pay the appellants' costs of the motion on an indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment