Solari v Franklins Limited [2001] NSWCC 21
The applicant sustained work-related injuries to her right arm and neck through repetitive data entry tasks in the respondent's employment, resulting in permanent impairment. Compensation should be awarded pursuant to s 66 and s 67, apportioned equally between the relevant insurers due to the periods of risk.
- Parties
- Applicant: Margaret Solari; Respondent: Franklins Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation / Judgment
- Outcome
- Award for the applicant
- Legal Topics
- Permanent Impairment, Apportionment Between Insurers, Assessment of Injury, Statutory Compensation Under S 66 and S 67
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Solari
Applicant
Franklins Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant sustained injury to her right arm and neck in the course of her employment with the respondent
- 2 Whether there is permanent impairment and loss of use attributable to employment
- 3 Apportionment of liability between insurers due to periods of coverage
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant sustained work-related injuries to her right arm and neck through repetitive data entry tasks in the respondent's employment, resulting in permanent impairment. Compensation should be awarded pursuant to s 66 and s 67, apportioned equally between the relevant insurers due to the periods of risk.
Court Disposition
Award for the applicant
Orders
- $8000 awarded for 10 percent loss of the right arm at or above the elbow under s 66
- $3000 awarded for 7.5 percent permanent impairment of the neck under s 66
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment