Young v King (No 3) [2012] NSWLEC 42

Young v King (No 3) [2012] NSWLEC 42

The applicant's Notice to Produce was set aside as it constituted an impermissible fishing expedition; she failed to establish a legitimate forensic purpose, nexus, or relevance for the documents sought, and thus the motion brought by the respondents to strike out the Notice to Produce was upheld.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Motion to Strike Out Notice to Produce Within Class 4 Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision—motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce; Orders and Directions
Outcome
Respondents' motion to set aside the Notice to Produce is upheld; applicant's Notice to Produce is set aside; costs of the dispute about the NTP are reserved; detailed further case management directions issued.
Legal Topics
['notice to Produce' 'subpoenas' 'abuse of Process' 'setting Aside Consent Orders']
['civil Procedure' 'property Law' 'environmental Law'] ['notice to Produce' 'subpoenas' 'abuse of Process' 'setting Aside Consent Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion to Strike Out Notice to Produce Within Class 4 Proceedings / Interlocutory Decision—motion to Set Aside Notice to Produce; Orders and Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Notice to Produce served by the applicant has a legitimate forensic purpose and relevance to the principal proceedings' 'Whether the documents sought are an impermissible fishing expedition' 'What principles determine setting aside a Notice to Produce or subpoena' 'Whether orders made in 2004 should be set aside on grounds of irregularity, illegality, mistake, lack of authority, fraud or unconscionability']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's Notice to Produce was set aside as it constituted an impermissible fishing expedition; she failed to establish a legitimate forensic purpose, nexus, or relevance for the documents sought, and thus the motion brought by the respondents to strike out the Notice to Produce was upheld.

Court Disposition

Respondents' motion to set aside the Notice to Produce is upheld; applicant's Notice to Produce is set aside; costs of the dispute about the NTP are reserved; detailed further case management directions issued.

Orders

  • ["The respondents' Notice of Motion dated 24 May 2011 is upheld, and the applicant's Notice to Produce dated 29 or 30 March 2011 is set aside." 'Costs of the dispute about the Notice to Produce are reserved.' 'Exhibit tendered at hearing returned to respondents.' 'Applicant must elect within 14 days which NOM to...