Evans v Levy [2010] NSWSC 504

Evans v Levy [2010] NSWSC 504

The plaintiff failed to establish that she had been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance, given her substantial unencumbered assets and sufficient income. Furthermore, there were no additional factors warranting the making of the claim under section 9(1) of the Family Provision Act 1982. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'testamentary Capacity' 'eligible Persons' 'adequate Provision' 'competing Beneficiaries']
['succession'] ['family Provision' 'testamentary Capacity' 'eligible Persons' 'adequate Provision' 'competing Beneficiaries']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff, as an adult step-daughter, is an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982' 'Whether the plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance' 'Whether there are factors which warrant the making of the application under section 9(1) of the Family Provision Act 1982' 'Assessment of the competing claims of beneficiaries']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to establish that she had been left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance, given her substantial unencumbered assets and sufficient income. Furthermore, there were no additional factors warranting the making of the claim under section 9(1) of the Family Provision Act 1982. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The summons is dismissed.' 'The Plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Defendant on a party and party basis.' 'The Defendant is entitled to recoup from the estate of the late Willem Mooy the difference between the costs recoverable from the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s costs on an indemnity basis.' 'The exhibits...