Fokas v Stack & Ors [2010] NSWSC 571
The Court found, based on evidence tendered, that the plaintiff had frequently instituted vexatious proceedings, in particular against each defendant, justifying prohibition orders sought under s 14 of the Act.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Maria Fokas; 1st Defendant: Dr J Stack; 2nd Defendant: Dr R Christou; 3rd Defendant: Dr A Saadi; 4th Defendant: Dr J Lee
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Vexatious Proceedings Order / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Defendants' application granted; plaintiff's motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Proceedings, Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, Prohibition Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maria Fokas
Plaintiff
Dr J Stack
1st Defendant
Dr R Christou
2nd Defendant
Dr A Saadi
3rd Defendant
Dr J Lee
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Vexatious Proceedings Order / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Maria Fokas has frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings against the defendants
- 2 Whether the plaintiff should be prohibited from instituting fresh proceedings or applications against the defendants without leave under s 14 of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found, based on evidence tendered, that the plaintiff had frequently instituted vexatious proceedings, in particular against each defendant, justifying prohibition orders sought under s 14 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application granted; plaintiff's motion dismissed.
Orders
- The plaintiff is prohibited from instituting fresh proceedings in any court against any of the defendants without first obtaining leave under s 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008.
- The plaintiff is prohibited from making any application in any legal proceedings involving any of the defendants without first obtaining leave under s 14 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment