Spiteri v Vassallo [2020] NSWSC 890

Spiteri v Vassallo [2020] NSWSC 890

Adequate provision for the plaintiff, the deceased’s de facto spouse, required a lump sum of $300,000 rather than the $200,000 intended by the deceased, having regard to the plaintiff’s financial needs, current assets, earning capacity, absence of competing support, the long-standing shared intention of the parties, and the legitimate claims of the deceased’s children; $300,000 will enable the plaintiff to acquire a property of reasonable standard while retaining funds for contingencies, balancing all competing claims under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Claim (succession) / Principal Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Plaintiff’s claim allowed in part; provision ordered out of estate
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'adequacy of Provision' 'de Facto Spouse Claims' 'succession Act 2006 (nsw)' 'estate Distribution' 'testamentary Intentions']
['succession Law' 'equity'] ['family Provision' 'adequacy of Provision' 'de Facto Spouse Claims' 'succession Act 2006 (nsw)' 'estate Distribution' 'testamentary Intentions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Claim (succession) / Principal Judgment at First Instance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether adequate provision was made for the plaintiff’s proper maintenance, education, and advancement in life under the deceased’s will' 'What amount of provision is appropriate given the circumstances of the parties and the estate']

Ratio Decidendi

Adequate provision for the plaintiff, the deceased’s de facto spouse, required a lump sum of $300,000 rather than the $200,000 intended by the deceased, having regard to the plaintiff’s financial needs, current assets, earning capacity, absence of competing support, the long-standing shared intention of the parties, and the legitimate claims of the deceased’s children; $300,000 will enable the plaintiff to acquire a property of reasonable standard while retaining funds for contingencies, balancing all competing claims under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Plaintiff’s claim allowed in part; provision ordered out of estate

Orders

  • ['Provision in a lump sum of $300,000 be made for the plaintiff’s maintenance, education and advancement in life out of the estate of the late Paul David Vassallo pursuant to the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).' 'Parties to submit agreed short minutes of order in relation to costs, or, failing agreement, written...