Darwich v Liverpool City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1153
The appeal is upheld as the Court is satisfied, per Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34(3), that the parties' agreement is a decision the Court could properly make; the development application complies with all relevant planning controls, statutory prerequisites, and environmental policies.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'multi Dwelling Housing' 'development Consent' 'land Use Zoning' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal against deemed refusal of the development application should be upheld' 'Whether the relevant statutory and local planning requirements are satisfied for granting development consent']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld as the Court is satisfied, per Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34(3), that the parties' agreement is a decision the Court could properly make; the development application complies with all relevant planning controls, statutory prerequisites, and environmental policies.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "Development Application No. DA 646/2022 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of multi dwelling housing consisting of four (4), two (2) storey, dwellings with associated at grade parking at 15 Magree Crescent, Chipping Norton, is determined by the granting of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment