Davis, Marian Rita v Repatriation Commission [1997] FCA 389

Davis, Marian Rita v Repatriation Commission [1997] FCA 389

The Court held that section 31(6)(a) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 empowered the Commission to cancel a pension where satisfied, having regard to any matter affecting payment of a pension, being a matter not before the Commission, Board or Tribunal at the time the pension was granted. The expression 'any matter' was not limited to facts or material in existence at the time of the original decision; it also extends to fresh medical opinions and reports obtained after that time. The new medical report provided by Professor Cade was such a matter and was capable of being considered by the Commission when reviewing the pension. Thus, the Commission acted within its jurisdiction under...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 May 1997
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under the Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act 1977 / Federal Court Decision – Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['review of Administrative Decisions' 'pensions – War Caused Death' 'effect of New Evidence' 'repatriation Law' 'judicial Review Grounds']
['administrative Law' "veterans' Entitlements"] ['review of Administrative Decisions' 'pensions – War Caused Death' 'effect of New Evidence' 'repatriation Law' 'judicial Review Grounds']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Under the Administrative Decisions (judicial Review) Act 1977 / Federal Court Decision – Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Commission had power under s31(6)(a) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 to cancel a widow's pension based on new medical evidence not before the Board." "Whether 'a matter' in s31(6)(a) is limited to material in existence at the time of the Board’s decision." 'Whether the exercise of the Commission’s power was for an improper purpose.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that section 31(6)(a) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 empowered the Commission to cancel a pension where satisfied, having regard to any matter affecting payment of a pension, being a matter not before the Commission, Board or Tribunal at the time the pension was granted. The expression 'any matter' was not limited to facts or material in existence at the time of the original decision; it also extends to fresh medical opinions and reports obtained after that time. The new medical report provided by Professor Cade was such a matter and was capable of being considered by the Commission when reviewing the pension. Thus, the Commission acted within its jurisdiction under...

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's taxed costs of the application."]