Feletti v Eales [2019] NSWCATAP 100
The Appeal Panel held that the Member did not err in concluding that enforcing a tenant's compliance with strata by-laws is not a duty or function of a lot owner under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 or the by-laws, because the by-laws bind tenants by their own force under s 135 and no specific power was identified to require a landlord to ensure tenant compliance. The Panel also held that the Member applied the correct objective test for noise complaints, did not make a material error of law in assessing the appellant's evidence, adequately considered the expert report, and was entitled to find that non-compliance with by-laws 1 or 14 was not established. The decision was not...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal Under S 80(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Against a Consumer and Commercial Division Decision Concerning Strata by Laws and Noise Transmission / Appeal Panel Decision on Appeal and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['noise Transmission' 'compliance With Strata by Laws' 'internal Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'objective Test for Noise Complaints' 'tribunal Jurisdiction Under S 232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal Under S 80(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Against a Consumer and Commercial Division Decision Concerning Strata by Laws and Noise Transmission / Appeal Panel Decision on Appeal and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether enforcing a tenant's compliance with strata by-laws is a function or duty of a lot owner under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 or the by-laws" 'Whether the Tribunal erred in failing to find breaches of by-law 1 concerning noise' "Whether the Tribunal failed to have regard to paragraphs 25-30 of Dr Renzo Tonin's expert report" 'Whether by-law 14 concerning floor coverings had been breached' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted because the decision was not fair and equitable or was against the weight of evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel held that the Member did not err in concluding that enforcing a tenant's compliance with strata by-laws is not a duty or function of a lot owner under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 or the by-laws, because the by-laws bind tenants by their own force under s 135 and no specific power was identified to require a landlord to ensure tenant compliance. The Panel also held that the Member applied the correct objective test for noise complaints, did not make a material error of law in assessing the appellant's evidence, adequately considered the expert report, and was entitled to find that non-compliance with by-laws 1 or 14 was not established. The decision was not...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The Owners-Strata Plan 2223 is joined as the second respondent.' 'Leave to appeal refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment