Gussoni v Burnheim [2018] NSWCATAP 75
The Tribunal's decision was set aside because the appellant was denied natural justice and procedural fairness when a critical issue was raised for the first time at hearing, with inadequate reasons provided, and significant evidence was overlooked, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mariella Gussoni; First Respondent: Susan Burnheim; Second Respondent: Kate Burnheim
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; original Tribunal decision set aside; matter remitted for determination according to law; each party to pay her and their own costs of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice, Consumer Law, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mariella Gussoni
Appellant
Susan Burnheim
First Respondent
Kate Burnheim
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in finding the appellant lacked standing to bring the claim
- 2 Whether adequate reasons were provided by the Tribunal
- 3 Whether there was a denial of natural justice and procedural fairness
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was set aside because the appellant was denied natural justice and procedural fairness when a critical issue was raised for the first time at hearing, with inadequate reasons provided, and significant evidence was overlooked, resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; original Tribunal decision set aside; matter remitted for determination according to law; each party to pay her and their own costs of the appeal.
Orders
- Appeal upheld.
- The decision of the Tribunal below is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment