BAFTIROVSKI v SKOFLEK [1993] NSWCA 17

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to consistent non-compliance by the appellant and failure to take requisite procedural steps despite warnings.

Parties: Appellant: Marija Skoflek; Respondent: Suljo Baftirovski
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 01 February 1993
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Motion for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome: appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Legal Topics: Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure

Practice and Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Marija Skoflek

Appellant

Suljo Baftirovski

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Motion for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to consistent non-compliance by the appellant and failure to take requisite procedural steps despite warnings.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

Dismiss the appeal of Marija Skoflek for want of prosecution.
Order that Marija Skoflek pay the costs of Suljo Baftirovski of the appeal and of the motion for dismissal.