Mario Bartucciotto v Euro Printing Co Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 365
The termination of employment was not for a valid reason connected with the employee's capacity or conduct or the operational requirements, but because the applicant refused to pay the respondent $30,000 for alleged loss. The applicant was not afforded procedural fairness. Compensation is awarded for unlawful termination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 S170 EA / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Compensation awarded.
- Legal Topics
- ['termination of Employment' 'unlawful Termination' 'serious Misconduct' 'procedural Fairness' 'compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 S170 EA / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether termination was for a valid reason under the Industrial Relations Act 1988' 'Whether there was serious misconduct' 'Whether procedural fairness was afforded' 'Appropriate remedy for unlawful termination']
Ratio Decidendi
The termination of employment was not for a valid reason connected with the employee's capacity or conduct or the operational requirements, but because the applicant refused to pay the respondent $30,000 for alleged loss. The applicant was not afforded procedural fairness. Compensation is awarded for unlawful termination.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Compensation awarded.
Orders
- ['The Respondent pay to the Applicant compensation in the sum of $1,850 within 21 days of the date of this order.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment