Mario Bartucciotto v Euro Printing Co Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 72

Mario Bartucciotto v Euro Printing Co Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 72

The applicant's failure to obtain written confirmation for a large customer order constituted a significant breach of duty and a valid reason for dismissal under s.170DE(1), but it did not amount to serious misconduct as it was not a deliberate flouting of an essential contractual condition; thus, summary dismissal without payment in lieu of notice was not justified, and five weeks' pay in lieu of notice was required under ss.170DB and 170EE(5).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 February 1996
Procedural Posture
Review of Judicial Registrar's Decision Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 / Single Judge Review Hearing
Outcome
Applicant succeeded in obtaining orders for increased compensation.
Legal Topics
['termination of Employment' 'serious Misconduct' 'unfair Dismissal' 'employment Compensation']
['industrial Law' 'employment Law'] ['termination of Employment' 'serious Misconduct' 'unfair Dismissal' 'employment Compensation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Review of Judicial Registrar's Decision Under Industrial Relations Act 1988 / Single Judge Review Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a valid reason for dismissal under s.170DE(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1988' 'Whether dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable under s.170DE(2)' 'Whether employee was guilty of serious misconduct under s.170DB(1)' 'Whether notice or payment in lieu of notice was required']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's failure to obtain written confirmation for a large customer order constituted a significant breach of duty and a valid reason for dismissal under s.170DE(1), but it did not amount to serious misconduct as it was not a deliberate flouting of an essential contractual condition; thus, summary dismissal without payment in lieu of notice was not justified, and five weeks' pay in lieu of notice was required under ss.170DB and 170EE(5).

Court Disposition

Applicant succeeded in obtaining orders for increased compensation.

Orders

  • ['The decision of the judicial registrar delivered on 20 July 1995 is set aside.' 'Pursuant to ss.170DB and 170EE(5) of the Industrial Relations Act 1988, the respondent is to pay the applicant damages of $3,350.' 'The respondent is directed to pay into Court the further sum of $1,500 within 14 days.' 'Stay of...