Turco v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd; Marinelli v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd; Turco v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 88

Turco v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd; Marinelli v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd; Turco v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 88

Although the appeals were treated as arguable, creditor protection warranted allowing bankruptcy proceedings to proceed to acts of bankruptcy and creditor's petitions, provided the respondent undertook to consent to adjournment of any petitions until the appeals were resolved; the applicants had not shown sufficient undue hardship to justify stays precluding that course.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Enforcement of District Court Judgments Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Applications for Stay Until Hearing of Appeals
Outcome
Applications for stay declined on terms including the respondent's undertaking to consent to adjournment of creditor's petitions until resolution of the appeals.
Legal Topics
['stay of Execution Pending Appeal' 'bankruptcy Notices' 'acts of Bankruptcy' "creditor's Petition" 'fresh or Further Evidence on Appeal']
['civil Procedure' 'bankruptcy' 'appeals'] ['stay of Execution Pending Appeal' 'bankruptcy Notices' 'acts of Bankruptcy' "creditor's Petition" 'fresh or Further Evidence on Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Stay of Enforcement of District Court Judgments Pending Appeal / Court of Appeal Applications for Stay Until Hearing of Appeals

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether enforcement of the District Court judgments should be stayed pending the appeals so that the applicants were not required to comply with bankruptcy notices.' "Whether the respondent's undertaking to consent to adjournment of any creditor's petition until resolution of the appeals adequately protected the applicants while preserving creditor interests."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the appeals were treated as arguable, creditor protection warranted allowing bankruptcy proceedings to proceed to acts of bankruptcy and creditor's petitions, provided the respondent undertook to consent to adjournment of any petitions until the appeals were resolved; the applicants had not shown sufficient undue hardship to justify stays precluding that course.

Court Disposition

Applications for stay declined on terms including the respondent's undertaking to consent to adjournment of creditor's petitions until resolution of the appeals.

Orders

  • ['Orders in accordance with short minutes handed up, as amended, initialled and dated 20 April 2009.']