Eguia v CPB Contractors Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 273
Leave was appropriate because the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the 20 day delay, raised at least a prima facie case on the affidavit material and application, and the prejudice identified by the respondent did not warrant refusal of leave.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- General Protections Court Application Under Fair Work Act 2009 (cth) / Application for Extension of Time Under S 370(a)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (cth)
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['general Protections' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Commence Proceeding Out of Time' 'fair Work Act 2009 (cth) S 370(a)(ii)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
General Protections Court Application Under Fair Work Act 2009 (cth) / Application for Extension of Time Under S 370(a)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted leave under s 370(a)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to commence the proceeding 20 days out of time.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was appropriate because the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the 20 day delay, raised at least a prima facie case on the affidavit material and application, and the prejudice identified by the respondent did not warrant refusal of leave.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time granted.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 370(a)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), the Applicant has leave to commence this proceeding out of time.' 'There will be no Order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment