Mariusz Zmudzinski v Cheapa Campa Pty Limited and Camper Travel Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 997

Mariusz Zmudzinski v Cheapa Campa Pty Limited and Camper Travel Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 997

Leave to cross-examine should be refused because the proposed cross-examination would not assist with the just determination of the motion and would not be conducive to the efficient disposal of the Court's business, as required by the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Cross Examine
Outcome
Application for leave to cross-examine not granted.
Legal Topics
['cross Examination in Interlocutory Application']
['civil Procedure'] ['cross Examination in Interlocutory Application']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Cross Examine

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to cross-examine the Plaintiff on affidavit evidence in an application for transfer of proceedings']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to cross-examine should be refused because the proposed cross-examination would not assist with the just determination of the motion and would not be conducive to the efficient disposal of the Court's business, as required by the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Application for leave to cross-examine not granted.

Orders

  • ['Leave to cross-examine the Plaintiff refused.']