Strickland v State of Western Australia [2010] FCA 272

Strickland v State of Western Australia [2010] FCA 272

The application had not been amended since rejection by the delegate of the Native Title Registrar, was not likely to be amended to change that result, and there was no other reason it should not be dismissed; accordingly, it was dismissed under s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Native Title Application / Dismissal After Failure of Registration Test
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['native Title Application' 'registration Test' 'dismissal S 190 F(6)']
['native Title Law'] ['native Title Application' 'registration Test' 'dismissal S 190 F(6)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Native Title Application / Dismissal After Failure of Registration Test

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the native title application should be dismissed under s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) after failing the registration test and not being amended']

Ratio Decidendi

The application had not been amended since rejection by the delegate of the Native Title Registrar, was not likely to be amended to change that result, and there was no other reason it should not be dismissed; accordingly, it was dismissed under s 190F(6) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']