Regina v Mark Andrew Grech [1999] NSWCCA 268
The mutual loving relationship between applicant and complainant is not a mitigating factor; the elements and policy of s 66F(2) are absolute. The sentencing discretion exercised was appropriate given the breach of trust, vulnerability of complainant, and absence of psychological injury evidence. Leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offences' 'persons in Authority' 'intellectual Disability' 'severity of Sentence' 'deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the severity of the sentence imposed for offences under s 66F(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) was appropriate.' 'Whether the mutual loving relationship between applicant and complainant was a mitigating factor for sentencing.' 'Whether lack of psychological injury to the complainant or borderline degree of intellectual disability affected sentencing.' 'Whether the sentencing judge misapplied precedent cases Parsons and Moore.']
Ratio Decidendi
The mutual loving relationship between applicant and complainant is not a mitigating factor; the elements and policy of s 66F(2) are absolute. The sentencing discretion exercised was appropriate given the breach of trust, vulnerability of complainant, and absence of psychological injury evidence. Leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'Appeal against sentence is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment