Lee v Woolworths Limited [2015] NSWSC 1789
Wickham neither owed nor breached a duty of care to Mr Lee in the circumstances. Wickham was not in control of the unloading area nor did it direct the activities causing injury. Manual handling was part of Mr Lee's employment responsibilities, and Wickham was entitled to do nothing; Mr Lee's employer was the proper entity owing the relevant duty.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Lee; Third Defendant: Wickhams Freight Lines Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Verdict for the defendant; proceedings dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Employer Liability, Manual Handling, Safe System of Work, Third Party Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Anthony Lee
Plaintiff
Wickhams Freight Lines Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wickham owed a duty of care to the plaintiff to assist or prevent him from unloading
- 2 Whether failure to provide assistance constituted negligence
- 3 Whether duty existed regarding restacking broken loads
Ratio Decidendi
Wickham neither owed nor breached a duty of care to Mr Lee in the circumstances. Wickham was not in control of the unloading area nor did it direct the activities causing injury. Manual handling was part of Mr Lee's employment responsibilities, and Wickham was entitled to do nothing; Mr Lee's employer was the proper entity owing the relevant duty.
Court Disposition
Verdict for the defendant; proceedings dismissed.
Orders
- Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment