Regina v Meres; Regina v Dineen [2003] NSWCCA 193

Regina v Meres; Regina v Dineen [2003] NSWCCA 193

The sentence imposed upon Meres was not manifestly excessive, nor did the parity argument with Joanne Dineen justify intervention; Meres' appeal was dismissed. For Dineen, the sentence on count seven was substantially excessive compared to sentencing patterns and warranted a reduction, with orders for a substituted sentence and non-parole period.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Outcome
(Meres) Appeal dismissed; (Dineen) Appeal allowed – new sentence substituted
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'ongoing Drug Trafficking' 'parity in Sentencing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether sentences imposed on Meres and Dineen were manifestly excessive' "Whether there was unjustifiable disparity between co-offenders' sentences (parity)" 'Appropriate discount for pleas of guilty' 'Application of sentencing patterns and statutory maximum']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed upon Meres was not manifestly excessive, nor did the parity argument with Joanne Dineen justify intervention; Meres' appeal was dismissed. For Dineen, the sentence on count seven was substantially excessive compared to sentencing patterns and warranted a reduction, with orders for a substituted sentence and non-parole period.

Court Disposition

(Meres) Appeal dismissed; (Dineen) Appeal allowed – new sentence substituted

Orders

  • ['Meres: Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted, but appeal dismissed' 'Dineen: Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed; sentence on count seven quashed and substituted with five years imprisonment and a three-year non-parole period from 6 June 2001; sentences on...