Langbein v Mottershead Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 1790
The written assignment executed on 27 April 2018 by SVP and MI, construed in its proper context, was broad enough to include Mr Langbein's promise to cause ASI to pay the debt, amounting to assignment of the warranty. The release of Mr Mottershead from contractual restraints so he could perform accounting work for ASI was adequate consideration for Mr Langbein's promise, whether or not further work was actually performed. Therefore, the grounds of appeal must fail.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['assignment of Contractual Rights' 'consideration' 'breach of Warranty' 'equitable Assignment' 'contractual Release']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Mr Langbein's promise was assigned to MI" 'Whether the promise was supported by consideration']
Ratio Decidendi
The written assignment executed on 27 April 2018 by SVP and MI, construed in its proper context, was broad enough to include Mr Langbein's promise to cause ASI to pay the debt, amounting to assignment of the warranty. The release of Mr Mottershead from contractual restraints so he could perform accounting work for ASI was adequate consideration for Mr Langbein's promise, whether or not further work was actually performed. Therefore, the grounds of appeal must fail.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment