Chow v R [2015] NSWDC 110
The appeal was dismissed because, even accepting evidence that lane one was partially obstructed, the appellant and his witness admitted there was room for a car to move in front of the truck and turn left from lane one. The law required drivers to move from lane two into lane one before making the left turn, and the conviction for turning left from the middle lane was lawfully and properly recorded.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction Recorded in the Local Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['left Turn From Multi Lane Road' 'traffic Offence' 'conviction Appeal' 'obstructed Lane']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction Recorded in the Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant turned left from Quay Street onto Ultimo Road otherwise than from the left hand lane of a multi-lane road contrary to s 28(1) of the Road Rules 2008.' 'Whether the partial obstruction of the left hand lane by construction works or a truck meant the appellant was not required to move into lane one before turning left.' 'Whether the conviction was lawfully and properly recorded.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because, even accepting evidence that lane one was partially obstructed, the appellant and his witness admitted there was room for a car to move in front of the truck and turn left from lane one. The law required drivers to move from lane two into lane one before making the left turn, and the conviction for turning left from the middle lane was lawfully and properly recorded.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment