R v HELMHOUT [2001] NSWCCA 372
Despite non-compliance with Clause 28, the trial judge properly exercised discretion under s 138 of the Evidence Act in admitting the confession, taking into account the appellant's personal characteristics, the probative value of the evidence, the absence of deliberate or reckless breach, and the importance of the evidence. The appellant, while Aboriginal, was not in fact vulnerable so as to require exclusion of the confession; the appeal should be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Confession' 'vulnerable Persons' 'improperly Obtained Evidence' 'evidence Obtained in Contravention of Regulation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the confession made by the appellant in custody should have been admitted despite non-compliance with Clause 28 of the Crimes (Detention after Arrest) Regulation 1998' 'Whether the trial judge properly exercised discretion under s 138 of the Evidence Act in admitting the confession']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite non-compliance with Clause 28, the trial judge properly exercised discretion under s 138 of the Evidence Act in admitting the confession, taking into account the appellant's personal characteristics, the probative value of the evidence, the absence of deliberate or reckless breach, and the importance of the evidence. The appellant, while Aboriginal, was not in fact vulnerable so as to require exclusion of the confession; the appeal should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' 'Conviction and sentence affirmed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment