Hughes v Fong [2016] NSWSC 1451
Claims of the plaintiffs, though based on separate transactions, are sufficiently connected by the misconduct of a common financial planner; the requirements of UCPR r 6.19 are met and joinder is permissible, subject to the plaintiffs re-pleading so that individual claims are identifiable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Strike Out Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'adequacy of Pleadings' 'professional Negligence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Strike Out Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the joinder of 17 plaintiffs in one statement of claim complies with rule 6.19 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)' 'Adequacy of pleadings for multiple plaintiffs' 'Whether claims arise out of the same transaction or series of transactions']
Ratio Decidendi
Claims of the plaintiffs, though based on separate transactions, are sufficiently connected by the misconduct of a common financial planner; the requirements of UCPR r 6.19 are met and joinder is permissible, subject to the plaintiffs re-pleading so that individual claims are identifiable.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["The second defendant's application to strike out the statement of claim as having been filed contrary to rule 6.19 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005) is dismissed." 'Parties are directed to bring in short minutes of order giving effect to reasons and for the future management of the proceedings.' 'Court will...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment