ROBINSON v NISHTOM PTY LIMITED & ANOR [2009] NSWSC 36
The vendor finance advance was made only under the Contract for Sale, whose special conditions were complete in themselves. The undated Loan Agreement and Mortgage were not shown to be contemporaneous or operative, their terms differed materially from the Contract for Sale, and the Mortgage did not identify or secure any specific debt or obligation. The plaintiff therefore could not maintain a possession claim based on the Mortgage. Although vacant possession was given after the plaintiff's scrap metal merchant cleared the site, leaving only residual items that did not substantially impede use of the large industrial property, the remaining claim for repayment of $400,000 plus interest...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Proceedings Concerning Possession and Repayment of Vendor Finance Alleged to Be Secured by Mortgage / Defendants' Notice of Motion for Summary Dismissal and Strike Out; Plaintiff's Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants' notice of motion granted as to dismissal and strike out of the mortgage-based possession claim; proceedings removed from the Possession List. Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed as to the possession relief; repayment claim to be re-listed for directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['vendor Finance' 'vacant Possession' 'registered Mortgage' 'summary Dismissal' 'set Off' 'possession List']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Proceedings Concerning Possession and Repayment of Vendor Finance Alleged to Be Secured by Mortgage / Defendants' Notice of Motion for Summary Dismissal and Strike Out; Plaintiff's Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreement for vendor finance was wholly contained within Special Condition 7 of the Contract for Sale.' 'Whether the mortgage granted by the defendants to Mr Kinsella was capable of giving an interest in the land to secure repayment of the vendor finance.' 'Whether the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy, was entitled to call in the vendor finance where the defendants contended that vacant possession had not been given.' 'Whether the undated Loan Agreement, the Contract for Sale and the Mortgage could be read together.' 'Whether vacant possession had been given after clearing of the property.']
Ratio Decidendi
The vendor finance advance was made only under the Contract for Sale, whose special conditions were complete in themselves. The undated Loan Agreement and Mortgage were not shown to be contemporaneous or operative, their terms differed materially from the Contract for Sale, and the Mortgage did not identify or secure any specific debt or obligation. The plaintiff therefore could not maintain a possession claim based on the Mortgage. Although vacant possession was given after the plaintiff's scrap metal merchant cleared the site, leaving only residual items that did not substantially impede use of the large industrial property, the remaining claim for repayment of $400,000 plus interest...
Court Disposition
Defendants' notice of motion granted as to dismissal and strike out of the mortgage-based possession claim; proceedings removed from the Possession List. Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed as to the possession relief; repayment claim to be re-listed for directions.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), Orders 1, 2 and 3 of the Statement of Claim be dismissed.' 'Paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14 (in regards to "Mortgage, Memorandum of Mortgage"), 15, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31 and 32 of the pleadings and particulars therein are struck...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment