Lilley v Lithgow City Council [2007] NSWLEC 608
Expert acoustic evidence demonstrated that with imposed conditions, aircraft noise would remain at a level not considered significant for affected properties and environmental areas. The proposal, with strict limitations on flight numbers and paths and a five-year consent period, is consistent with the LEP's aims and objectives. The appeal should therefore be upheld and consent granted subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'aircraft Noise' 'appropriate Standards for Aircraft Noise' 'zoning' 'public Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent for a helipad should be granted with conditions related to aircraft noise impacts' 'Appropriate noise standards for helicopter operations in rural-residential zones' 'Impact of helicopter noise on nearby properties and national parks' 'Consistency with objectives and aims of Local Environmental Plan']
Ratio Decidendi
Expert acoustic evidence demonstrated that with imposed conditions, aircraft noise would remain at a level not considered significant for affected properties and environmental areas. The proposal, with strict limitations on flight numbers and paths and a five-year consent period, is consistent with the LEP's aims and objectives. The appeal should therefore be upheld and consent granted subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application granted with conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application to establish a heliport on lot 5 DP 244899, 4675 Castlereagh Highway, Capertee is granted subject to conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibits are returned except Exhibits 8, A, B and F.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment