Morris v Leichhardt Council [2008] NSWLEC 1106
The proposed modification to allow the swimming pool is substantially the same development as previously approved, as it does not radically transform or alter the essential character of the development. The impacts associated with noise, excavation, damp, and the tree are considered reasonable with the conditions imposed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mark Morris; Respondent: Leichhardt Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Development Consent, Section 96 Application, Noise Impacts, Excavation Impacts, Damp Impacts, Impact on Trees, Heritage Item, Residential Development
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Morris
Applicant
Leichhardt Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed modification is substantially the same development as originally approved
- 2 Whether noise, excavation, damp, and impact on tree are acceptable
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modification to allow the swimming pool is substantially the same development as previously approved, as it does not radically transform or alter the essential character of the development. The impacts associated with noise, excavation, damp, and the tree are considered reasonable with the conditions imposed.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Consent is granted to the application under section 96 to modify the development consent as set out in Annexure 'A'. The consent as modified is set out in Annexure 'B'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment