Murauer v Andresson [2016] NSWCATAP 15
The Tribunal erred in law by not properly addressing whether the landlord had notice of the need for repair or ought reasonably to have known of it, and whether the landlord failed to act with reasonable diligence. The evidence did not support that the landlord ought reasonably to have known of the presence of mould or the need for repairs. Decision and order for landlord to pay $3,475.00 to tenants is set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; principal order set aside; otherwise appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ["landlord's Obligations" 'damages for Breach' 'repair of Rented Premises' 'mould Infestation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Tribunal applied correct legal test under sections 52 and 63 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010' 'Whether landlord had notice of repairs required under s 65(3)' 'Whether landlord breached statutory obligations regarding repair and fitness for habitation']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by not properly addressing whether the landlord had notice of the need for repair or ought reasonably to have known of it, and whether the landlord failed to act with reasonable diligence. The evidence did not support that the landlord ought reasonably to have known of the presence of mould or the need for repairs. Decision and order for landlord to pay $3,475.00 to tenants is set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; principal order set aside; otherwise appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ["The appeal is allowed, in so far as it relates to the Tribunal's finding and decision that the landlord is to pay the amount of $3,475.00 to the tenants, is set aside." 'Otherwise the appeal is dismissed.' 'The tenants are to reimburse the sum of $3,475.00 to the landlord.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment