Dresler v Mrish [2000] NSWSC 609
The fixture should be vacated on the basis of the first defendant’s solicitor’s responsibility for failure to prepare; the solicitor is to indemnify the plaintiff for the costs thrown away, to be assessed and paid forthwith.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Fixture
- Outcome
- Fixture vacated on terms by consent; new hearing dates set; costs thrown away to be paid by the first defendant’s solicitor.
- Legal Topics
- ['vacation of Fixture' 'case Management' 'supreme Court Rules' 'costs Thrown Away']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Fixture
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the fixture should be vacated due to the first defendant's solicitor's lack of preparation" 'Who should bear the costs thrown away by the adjournment']
Ratio Decidendi
The fixture should be vacated on the basis of the first defendant’s solicitor’s responsibility for failure to prepare; the solicitor is to indemnify the plaintiff for the costs thrown away, to be assessed and paid forthwith.
Court Disposition
Fixture vacated on terms by consent; new hearing dates set; costs thrown away to be paid by the first defendant’s solicitor.
Orders
- ['Fixture vacated.' 'Proceedings adjourned to 7–9 August 2000.' 'First defendant’s solicitor to indemnify plaintiff for costs thrown away, to be assessed and paid forthwith.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment