Leslie v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 203
Except for statutory adjustment required for one count, the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive, appropriately considered totality and parity principles, and complied with the relevant statutory and case law guides. Adjustment to comply with s 45 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 for offence (1) was warranted; otherwise, appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal – Leave to Appeal and Re Sentencing
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; sentence for offence (1) quashed and re-sentenced; other sentences confirmed; appeal otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'multiple Serious Offences' 'manifestly Excessive Sentences' 'parity Principle' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal – Leave to Appeal and Re Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether particular sentences imposed for multiple offences were manifestly excessive' 'Application of the parity principle between co-offenders' 'Principle of totality in sentencing' 'Appropriateness of the ratio between non-parole period and total sentence']
Ratio Decidendi
Except for statutory adjustment required for one count, the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive, appropriately considered totality and parity principles, and complied with the relevant statutory and case law guides. Adjustment to comply with s 45 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 for offence (1) was warranted; otherwise, appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; sentence for offence (1) quashed and re-sentenced; other sentences confirmed; appeal otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Sentence for offence (1) (aggravated break enter and steal at Meadowbank Convenience Store) quashed and replaced with a term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years commencing 27 December 2008 and expiring 26 December 2011, with a balance of term of 1 year expiring 26...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment