Resevsky & anor v Smith & Di Stefano [2007] NSWLEC 519
The Grey Gum has caused significant past damage to boundary walls and poses a risk of further failure due to structural decay; the support from the wall cannot safely be removed without removing the tree, thus removal of the Grey Gum and reconstruction of the wall are necessary and appropriate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mark Resevsky; Applicant: Andrea Resevsky; Respondent: Ian Smith; Respondent: Rose Di Stefano
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Neighbour Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part. Orders made for removal of the Grey Gum and replacement of damaged boundary wall sections at the respondents' expense.
- Legal Topics
- Trees and Boundary Disputes, Damage to Boundary Structures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Resevsky
Applicant
Andrea Resevsky
Applicant
Ian Smith
Respondent
Rose Di Stefano
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Grey Gum tree caused damage to the boundary wall under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 2 Whether orders should be made for removal of the tree and reconstruction of the wall
Ratio Decidendi
The Grey Gum has caused significant past damage to boundary walls and poses a risk of further failure due to structural decay; the support from the wall cannot safely be removed without removing the tree, thus removal of the Grey Gum and reconstruction of the wall are necessary and appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part. Orders made for removal of the Grey Gum and replacement of damaged boundary wall sections at the respondents' expense.
Orders
- Grey Gum (Eucalyptus punctata) on the respondents' property to be removed and stump-ground to 200 mm below ground by AQF level 3 qualified arborist at respondents' expense within 60 days; arborist to have access to relevant properties as specified; after removal, applicants to provide three written quotations for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment