Frahm v R [2009] NSWCCA 249
The sentencing judge erred in according excessive weight to the applicant's antecedents and the Henry guideline judgment, given the low level of objective seriousness of the offence and absence of several aggravating factors. The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive; therefore, the appeal should be allowed and the applicant re-sentenced to a lesser term.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence quashed; new sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'assault With Intent to Rob in Company' 'guideline Judgments' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' "Whether undue weight was placed on the applicant's criminal history" 'Proper application of the guideline judgment in R v Henry to the offence committed']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in according excessive weight to the applicant's antecedents and the Henry guideline judgment, given the low level of objective seriousness of the offence and absence of several aggravating factors. The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive; therefore, the appeal should be allowed and the applicant re-sentenced to a lesser term.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence quashed; new sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Allow the appeal and quash the sentence imposed in the District Court.' 'Sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 2 years to commence on 1 April 2008 and to expire on 31 March 2010 with a total term of 3 years 3 months to expire on 30 June 2011.' 'The applicant is eligible for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment