Skondin v R [2006] NSWCCA 59
Once the conviction for malicious wounding was quashed and verdict of not guilty entered, the sentence for armed robbery, previously made partially cumulative upon the now-quashed sentence, must be adjusted to recognise the applicant's time already served and not be referable to an offence in respect of which the applicant has been acquitted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mark Shane Skondin; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment on Leave to Appeal and Adjustment of Sentence Commencement Date
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed to the extent of adjusting commencement date of armed robbery sentence
- Legal Topics
- Armed Robbery, Malicious Wounding, Sentencing, Parole, Cumulative Sentences, Quashing Conviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Shane Skondin
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Judgment on Leave to Appeal and Adjustment of Sentence Commencement Date
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the commencement date of the sentence for armed robbery should be adjusted following the quashing of the conviction for malicious wounding
- 2 whether custody prior to parole expiration can be treated as referable to earlier sentence in absence of parole revocation
Ratio Decidendi
Once the conviction for malicious wounding was quashed and verdict of not guilty entered, the sentence for armed robbery, previously made partially cumulative upon the now-quashed sentence, must be adjusted to recognise the applicant's time already served and not be referable to an offence in respect of which the applicant has been acquitted.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed to the extent of adjusting commencement date of armed robbery sentence
Orders
- leave to appeal granted
- appeal allowed, to the extent only that the sentence imposed commence on 17 October 2002, the non-parole period to expire on 16 October 2005, and the total sentence to expire on 16 October 2008
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment