Silbermann, Greaves,Rich v CGU Insurance Limited [2002] NSWSC 1195
Clause 3.1 of the Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Policy operates to exclude CGU's obligation to indemnify the plaintiffs for Defence Costs and other losses if dishonest, fraudulent or malicious conduct is established by judgment or final adjudication, which may be obtained in the same indemnity proceedings. The exclusion applies to Defence Costs under clauses 2.1, 2.6, Insuring Agreement A, and Insuring Agreement B, and a judgment obtained in these proceedings is sufficient to trigger the exclusion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Determination of Separate Questions / Judgment on Separate Questions
- Outcome
- Questions answered in favour of CGU Insurance Limited; exclusion clause 3.1 applies in the manner asserted by the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['directors and Officers Liability Insurance' 'exclusion Clauses' 'indemnity for Defence Costs' 'liquidation' 'fraud and Dishonesty in Insurance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion for Determination of Separate Questions / Judgment on Separate Questions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether CGU can rely on Exclusion Clause 3.1 absent an existing judgment, order or other final adjudication.' 'Whether CGU can seek a judgment in the same proceedings to exclude indemnity via Clause 3.1.' 'Whether Clause 3.1 operates to exclude liability for indemnity for Defence Costs under clauses 2.1, 2.6, Insuring Agreement A, and Insuring Agreement B of the Policy.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 3.1 of the Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Policy operates to exclude CGU's obligation to indemnify the plaintiffs for Defence Costs and other losses if dishonest, fraudulent or malicious conduct is established by judgment or final adjudication, which may be obtained in the same indemnity proceedings. The exclusion applies to Defence Costs under clauses 2.1, 2.6, Insuring Agreement A, and Insuring Agreement B, and a judgment obtained in these proceedings is sufficient to trigger the exclusion.
Court Disposition
Questions answered in favour of CGU Insurance Limited; exclusion clause 3.1 applies in the manner asserted by the defendant.
Orders
- ['1. CGU Insurance Limited may rely on Exclusion Clause 3.1 absent an existing judgment, order or final adjudication.' '2. CGU may seek a judgment or adjudication in the same proceedings to exclude liability under Clause 3.1.' '3. Exclusion Clause 3.1 operates to exclude liability for Defence Costs under clauses...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment