NSW Police v Smith [2016] NSWLC 24
It was not more appropriate to deal with Mr Smith's matters under s 32, as he requires greater oversight and monitoring than provided by s 32, particularly regarding compliance and abstinence from alcohol. His inability to remember the 2014 events, even if accepted, does not render him unfit to be tried; contemporaneous evidence exists and the legal test for permanent stay is not met.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Diversion Under S 32 Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 and for Permanent Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- ['diversion Under Mental Health Legislation' 'fitness to Be Tried' 'permanent Stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Diversion Under S 32 Mental Health (forensic Provisions) Act 1990 and for Permanent Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the charges against Mr Smith should be dealt with by diversion pursuant to s 32 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990' 'Whether the 2014 charges should be permanently stayed on the basis of unfitness to be tried']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not more appropriate to deal with Mr Smith's matters under s 32, as he requires greater oversight and monitoring than provided by s 32, particularly regarding compliance and abstinence from alcohol. His inability to remember the 2014 events, even if accepted, does not render him unfit to be tried; contemporaneous evidence exists and the legal test for permanent stay is not met.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- ['Application for diversion under s 32 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 refused.' 'Application for permanent stay of the 2014 charges refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment