Flowers v State of NSW [2020] NSWSC 1390
Leave to amend refused because the proposed further amended statement of claim was embarrassing, largely unintelligible, and failed to set out the case to be met with sufficient clarity; amendments were untimely with no explanation for delay and would frustrate the overriding purpose of just, quick, and cheap...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark Stephen Flowers; Defendant: State of NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application—application for Leave to Further Amend Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Stephen Flowers
Plaintiff
State of NSW
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Application—application for Leave to Further Amend Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend the statement of claim further in light of history of the proceedings, content of amendments, and absence of explanation for delay
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend refused because the proposed further amended statement of claim was embarrassing, largely unintelligible, and failed to set out the case to be met with sufficient clarity; amendments were untimely with no explanation for delay and would frustrate the overriding purpose of just, quick, and cheap resolution of the real issues.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- The notice of motion filed by the plaintiff on 11 September 2020 is dismissed.
- The question of costs is reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment