Nugent, M.T. v. Brialkim Pty Ltd & Anor [1985] FCA 416
The address given in the bankruptcy notice was sufficient as the appellant failed to establish that it was not reasonably practicable to make payment or to secure or compound at that address; it satisfied the requirement that the address be one where payment could be made or arrangements could be entered into during the relevant period.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mark T. Nugent; Respondent: Brialkim Pty. Ltd.; Respondent: Owen Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Requirements of Bankruptcy Notice, Statement of Address of Creditor, Authority to Receive Payment, Adequacy of Address in Bankruptcy Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark T. Nugent
Appellant
Brialkim Pty. Ltd.
Respondent
Owen Pty. Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a bankruptcy notice is invalidated by inadequacy in the address provided for the judgment creditor
- 2 What constitutes a sufficient address for the purposes of bankruptcy notices under the Bankruptcy Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The address given in the bankruptcy notice was sufficient as the appellant failed to establish that it was not reasonably practicable to make payment or to secure or compound at that address; it satisfied the requirement that the address be one where payment could be made or arrangements could be entered into during the relevant period.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment