Humphries v R; Ponfield v R (No. 2) [2016] NSWCCA 91
The identified errors in the principal judgment and orders were capable of correction under r 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 (NSW), and the sentence order for Mark Humphries should be amended to reflect the Court's stated intention of a non-parole period of three years and nine months commencing 19 January 2015 and expiring 18 October 2018 with an additional term of two years and three months expiring 18 January 2021.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Post Judgment Correction of Errors Pursuant to R 50 C
- Outcome
- Errors in the principal judgment and orders corrected; amended judgment to be published; republished orders stand as a consolidated statement of the orders of the Court.
- Legal Topics
- ['correction of Errors in Judgment' 'sentencing' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Post Judgment Correction of Errors Pursuant to R 50 C
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether errors in the principal judgment and orders should be corrected pursuant to r 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 (NSW).' "Whether the recorded expiry dates and sentence in the principal judgment and orders should be amended to reflect the Court's intention."]
Ratio Decidendi
The identified errors in the principal judgment and orders were capable of correction under r 50C of the Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 (NSW), and the sentence order for Mark Humphries should be amended to reflect the Court's stated intention of a non-parole period of three years and nine months commencing 19 January 2015 and expiring 18 October 2018 with an additional term of two years and three months expiring 18 January 2021.
Court Disposition
Errors in the principal judgment and orders corrected; amended judgment to be published; republished orders stand as a consolidated statement of the orders of the Court.
Orders
- ['The reference at [5] in the principal judgment to "18 January 2021" is amended to read "18 April 2021";' 'The reference at [7] in the principal judgment to "18 June 2017" is amended to read "18 March 2017";' 'Order (3) at [73] and in the form of the sentence ordered by the Court on 13 May 2016 is amended to read:...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment