Marketlend Pty Ltd v Blackburn [2020] NSWDC 358
Marketlend Pty Ltd did not prove on the balance of probabilities that Sarah Louise Blackburn used her DocuSign account to sign the First Agreement on 2 November 2017. The independent evidence was equivocal, Marketlend lacked contemporaneous or independent evidence that Sarah knowingly signed or agreed to the Marketlend documents, Matthew Charles Blackburn's evidence was unreliable and affected by dishonesty in signing later documents on Sarah's behalf, and Sarah's and Shan Creswick's evidence supported the finding that Sarah was not at the Cleveland property at the relevant time. The Court was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that Matthew used Sarah's account to sign the First...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Verdict for the second defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Formation' 'agreement' 'execution of Documents by Electronic Means' 'burden of Proof in Civil Proceedings' 'docu Sign Electronic Signatures' 'personal Guarantee']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Sarah Louise Blackburn used her DocuSign account at about 1.30pm on 2 November 2017 at the Cleveland property to sign the First Agreement.' 'Whether Marketlend Pty Ltd proved on the balance of probabilities that the second defendant signed the First Agreement.' "Whether Matthew Charles Blackburn used Sarah Louise Blackburn's DocuSign account to sign the First Agreement without her knowledge or consent."]
Ratio Decidendi
Marketlend Pty Ltd did not prove on the balance of probabilities that Sarah Louise Blackburn used her DocuSign account to sign the First Agreement on 2 November 2017. The independent evidence was equivocal, Marketlend lacked contemporaneous or independent evidence that Sarah knowingly signed or agreed to the Marketlend documents, Matthew Charles Blackburn's evidence was unreliable and affected by dishonesty in signing later documents on Sarah's behalf, and Sarah's and Shan Creswick's evidence supported the finding that Sarah was not at the Cleveland property at the relevant time. The Court was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that Matthew used Sarah's account to sign the First...
Court Disposition
Verdict for the second defendant.
Orders
- ['Verdict for the second defendant.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the second defendant as agreed or assessed, on the ordinary basis.' 'I grant leave to the parties to approach my Associate to relist the matter if an alternate costs order is sought.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment