Loprete v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 1476
The ACC had an implied statutory power to amend its authorisation and determination for a special investigation under s 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Section 30(2) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 abrogates the privilege against self-incrimination with respect to foreign as well as domestic offences.
- Parties
- Applicant: Marlene Lillian Loprete; First Respondent: Australian Crime Commission; Second Respondent: Geoffrey Ernest Sage
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Australian Crime Commission Act, Acts Interpretation Act, Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marlene Lillian Loprete
Applicant
Australian Crime Commission
First Respondent
Geoffrey Ernest Sage
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Board of Australian Crime Commission had power to amend an authorisation and determination for a special investigation
- 2 Whether a new determination required under s 7C of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth)
- 3 Whether Acts Interpretation Act 1901 s 33(3) applied to authorisation and determination amendments
Ratio Decidendi
The ACC had an implied statutory power to amend its authorisation and determination for a special investigation under s 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Section 30(2) of the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 abrogates the privilege against self-incrimination with respect to foreign as well as domestic offences.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment