Anae v R [2018] NSWCCA 73
The sentencing judge's revocation of bail and indication that full-time imprisonment was the only appropriate sentence before hearing the applicant's submissions would cause a fair-minded lay observer reasonably to apprehend prejudgment, so the apprehended bias ground was upheld and the sentencing discretion was exercised afresh. On re-sentence, the offence was above mid-range objective seriousness, involved unprovoked violence with a degree of premeditation and caused extremely severe traumatic brain injury with likely permanent effects; the applicant did not establish genuine remorse, good prospects of rehabilitation or special circumstances, and the original head sentence and...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal From Sentence Imposed in the District Court; Leave Granted But Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['recklessly Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm' 'apprehended Bias' 'special Circumstances' 'remorse' 'manifest Excess' 're Sentencing' 'full Time Imprisonment' 'alcohol Related Violence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal From Sentence Imposed in the District Court; Leave Granted But Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge's conduct gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias against the applicant before sentence was passed." 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in not finding special circumstances.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in not finding any demonstration of genuine remorse.' 'Whether the overall sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or whether a lesser sentence was warranted on re-sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's revocation of bail and indication that full-time imprisonment was the only appropriate sentence before hearing the applicant's submissions would cause a fair-minded lay observer reasonably to apprehend prejudgment, so the apprehended bias ground was upheld and the sentencing discretion was exercised afresh. On re-sentence, the offence was above mid-range objective seriousness, involved unprovoked violence with a degree of premeditation and caused extremely severe traumatic brain injury with likely permanent effects; the applicant did not establish genuine remorse, good prospects of rehabilitation or special circumstances, and the original head sentence and...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment