Marrickville Council -V- Syfurn P/L & Ors. [1999] NSWLEC 71
The Council, as the successful party by virtue of consent orders which provided the relief claimed, is entitled to its costs, as no relevant misconduct by the Council was found that would justify departing from the rule that costs follow the event.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings / Post Settlement (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Council awarded costs; Respondents' application for costs refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'injunctions' 'development Consent' 'planning Law Enforcement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings / Post Settlement (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Marrickville Council ought to receive its costs after settlement by consent orders, having obtained the relief sought.' 'Whether Council was guilty of misconduct such that costs should be denied or paid to Respondents.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Council, as the successful party by virtue of consent orders which provided the relief claimed, is entitled to its costs, as no relevant misconduct by the Council was found that would justify departing from the rule that costs follow the event.
Court Disposition
Council awarded costs; Respondents' application for costs refused.
Orders
- ["Respondents to pay the Applicant's (Council's) costs as agreed or, failing agreement, as assessed." "Respondents' application for costs refused." 'Exhibits to remain on the Court papers.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment